-
摘要: 20世纪70年代,美国医学界通过流行病学线索发现卫生棉条可能会导致女性患上中毒性休克综合征。后续的流行病学研究提示卫生棉条的吸收率是个中关键,需要制定行业标准。医学专家、卫生管理者、生产商与消费者组织等角色都对这一健康危机做出应对,并出于各自目的参与了卫生棉条吸收率标准的制定。几方对测定方法和等级划分争论不休,未能达成共识。最终,美国食品药品监督管理局在压力之下选择了一个权宜方案,颁布了卫生棉条吸收率标准。这一标准影响了我国的行业标准,但其中尚存在许多问题,需要学界予以关注。Abstract: In the 1970s, the medical community found clues through epidemiological investigations that tampons could cause Toxic Shock Syndrome among women. Subsequent epidemiological studies suggested that the absorption rate might be the most critical influencing factor. Thus, a standard for tampon absorption rate was needed. Medical experts, health officials, tampon manufacturers, and consumer organizations, each with their interests, all responded to this health crisis and participated in the making of a standard for tampon absorption rate. However, those parties failed to reach a consensus on the measurement method and classification of the absorption rate. The final standard for the absorption rate of tampons enacted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration was a stopgap measure. This standard, which still has many problems and needs further investigation from scholars and health officials, has further influenced the industry standard of tampon absorption rate in China.
-
Keywords:
- Toxic Shock Syndrome /
- tampon /
- woman /
- history of medicine
-
-
表 1 FDA第一版卫生棉条吸收率标准
吸收率等级 1g卫生棉条能吸收生理盐水的重量/克 初级 junior ≤6 常规 regular >6,≤9 超级 super >9,≤12 超特级 super plus >12,≤15 表 2 FDA第二版卫生棉条吸收率标准
吸收率等级 1g卫生棉条能吸收生理盐水的重量/克 初级 junior ≤6 常规 regular >6,≤9 超级 super >9,≤12 超特级 super plus >12,≤15 极多 ultra >15,≤18 -
[1] 靳家玉, 王建捷, 贺昌海, 等. 中国妇女使用阴道卫生棉条和卫生巾的临床单盲随机比较研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2006, 22(9): 711-713.
[2] HOUPPERT K. The Curse: Confronting the Last Unmentionable Taboo: Menstruation[M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1999: 1.
[3] KISSLING E A. Capitalizing on the Curse: The Business of Menstruation[M]. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2006: 1.
[4] VOSTRAL S L. Under wraps: A history of menstrual hygiene technology[M]. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2011:1.
[5] FREIDENFELDS L. The Modern Period: Menstruation in Twentieth-Century America[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009:1.
[6] WEISSFELD A S. The history of tampons: From ancient times to an FDA-regulated medical device[J]. Clin Microbiol Newsl, 2010, 32(10): 73-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2010.04.003
[7] VOSTRAL S L. Of mice and (wo)men: Tampons, menstruation, and testing[M]//The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
[8] VOSTRAL S. Toxic shock syndrome, tampons and laboratory standard-setting[J]. CMAJ, 2017, 189(20): E726-E728.
[9] HAAS E C. Catamenial device: US2024218[P]. 1935-12-17.
[10] RØSTVIK C M. Cash Flow: The Businesses of Menstruation[M]. London: Ucl Press, 2022.
[11] HORWITZ R. Menstrual Tampon[EB/OL]. (2020-05-25)[2023-02-08]. https://hdl.handle.net/10776/13151.
[12] PROCTER & GAMBLE. About Tampax - First Tampon - History of Tampax - Tampax. com[EB/OL]. (2013-05-21)[2023-02-08]. https://tampax.com/en-us/about/our-story/history-of-tampax/.
[13] PLAYTEX. Company History [EB/OL]. [2022-06-16]. https://www.company-histories.com/Playtex-Products-Inc-Company-History.html.
[14] UBYKOTEX. About Us [EB/OL]. [2022-06-16]. https://www.ubykotex.com/en-us/timeline.
[15] VOSTRAL S L. Rely and Toxic Shock Syndrome: A technological health crisis[J]. Yale J Biol Med, 2011, 84(4): 447-459.
[16] BLANC D B. Fake silk: The lethal history of viscose rayon[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017: 567-767.
[17] Museum of Menstruation. Rely Tampon: It Even Absorbs the Worry[EB/OL]. (2007-10-21) [2023-06-04]. http://www.mum.org/Rely.htm.
[18] KOHEN J M. The History of the Regulation of Menstrual Tampons[D]. Boston: Harvard University, 2001.
[19] 周 华. 中毒休克综合征[J]. 中国临床医生, 2006, 34(8): 12-13.
[20] TODD J K, FISHAUT M, KAPRAL F, et al. Toxic-shock syndrome associated with phage-group-I Staphylococci[J]. Lancet, 1978, 2(8100): 1116-1118.
[21] TODD J K. Toxic shock syndrome: A perspective through the looking glass[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1982, 96(6Pt2): 839-842.
[22] Centers for Discase Control and Prevention. Toxic-shock syndrome, United States, 1970-1982[J]. MMWR, 1982, (31)16: 201-204.
[23] SCHLIEVERT P M, DAVIS C C. Device associated menstrual toxic shock syndrome[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2020, 33(3): e00032-19.
[24] Centers for Discase Control and Prevention. Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Toxic-Shock Syndrome: United States[J]. MMWR, 1997, 22: 492-495.
[25] DWORKIN M S. Outbreak investigations around the world: case studies in infectious disease field epidemiology[M]. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2010: 79-103.
[26] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Toxic-shock syndrome, United States, 1970-1980[J]. MMWR, 1981, 30(3): 25-33.
[27] Code of Food Regulation. 21 C. F. R. 884.5460, 884.5470-Unscented menstrual tampon [EB/OL]. (2022-10-17)[2023-06-02]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=884.5470.
[28] KEHRBERG M W, LATHAM R H, HASLAM B T, et al. Risk factors for staphylococcal toxic-shock syndrome[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 1981, 114(6): 873-879. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113257
[29] WILLIAM G. After 8 years, procter still not free of the rely controversy[N]. Chicago Tribune, 1989-03-27(36).
[30] Museum of Menstruation and Women's Health. Back of Procter & Gamble letter to dealers about withdrawing Rely tampon, 22 September 1980, at the Museum of Menstruation and Women's Health[EB/OL]. (1980-09-22)[2023-03-08]. http://www.mum.org/relyart9.htm.
[31] OSTERHOLM M T, DAVIS J P, GIBSON R W, et al. Tri-state toxic-state syndrome study. I. Epidemiologic findings[J]. J Infect Dis, 1982, 145(4): 431-440. doi: 10.1093/infdis/145.4.431
[32] REINGOLD L, HARGRETT N T, SHANDS K N, et al. Toxic shock syndrome surveillance in the United States, 1980 to 1981[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1982, 96(6 Pt 2): 875-880.
[33] SCHLECH W F, 3rd, SHANDS K N, REINGOLD A L, et al. Risk factors for development of toxic shock syndrome: Association with a tampon brand[J]. JAMA, 1982, 248(7): 835-839. doi: 10.1001/jama.1982.03330070023024
[34] SHANDS K N, SCHLECH W F, 3rd, HARGRETT N T, et al. Toxic shock syndrome: Case-control studies at the Centers for Disease Control[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1982, 96(6 Pt 2): 895-898.
[35] LATHAM R H, KEHRBERG M W, JACOBSON J A, et al. Toxic shock syndrome in Utah: A case-control and surveillance study[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1982, 96(6 Pt 2): 906-908.
[36] ANON. Procter & gamble settles a toxic shock suit[N]. New York Time, 1982-03-20(16) .
[37] Justia Law. Kehm v. Procter & Gamble Co., 580 F. Supp. 890 (N. D. Iowa 1982)[EB/OL]. (1982-05-05)[2023-02-02]. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/580/890/1449848/.
[38] BOBEL C. Health Care for Women International [M]. Boston: Routledge, 2008: 738-754.
[39] WOLFE S M. Dangerous delays in tampon absorbency warnings[J]. JAMA, 1987, 258(7): 949-951. doi: 10.1001/jama.1987.03400070087042
[40] Institute of Medicine. Toxic Shock Syndrome Assessment of Current Information and Future Research Needs: Report of a Study[M]. Washington, D. C. : National Academy Press, 1982: 45-59.
[41] REINGOLD A L, BROOME C V, GAVENTA S, et al. Risk factors for menstrual toxic shock syndrome: Results of a multistate case-control study[J]. Rev Infect Dis, 1989, 11(Suppl 1): S35-S42.
[42] Food and Drug Administration. 21 U. S. Code§360c - Classification of devices intended for human use[EB/OL]. [2023-03-08]. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360c.
[43] Federal Register. 47 Fed. Reg. 26982[EB/OL]. (1982-06-22)[2022-12-07]. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/fedreg/fr047/fr047120/fr047120.pdf.
[44] Food and Drug Administration.53 Fed. Reg. 37,250[EB/OL]. (1988-09-23)[2023-03-10]. https://archives.federalregister.gov/issue_slice/1988/9/23/37247-37279.pdf.
[45] 彭 斯. 医学伦理学经典案例[M]. 聂精保, 胡林英, 译. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 2010: 25.
[46] VOSTRAL S. Toxic shock syndrome, tampon absorbency, and feminist science[J]. Catalyst, 2017, 3(1): 1-30.
[47] VOSTRAL S L. Toxic Shock: A Social History[M]. New York: New York University Press, 2018: 552-559.
[48] BOBEL C, WINKLER I T, FAHS B, et al. The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies[M]. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020: 534-535.
[49] ROME E R, WOLHANDLER J, REAME N. The absorbency of tampons[J]. JAMA, 1988, 259(5): 685-686.
[50] BERKLEY S F, HIGHTOWER A W, BROOME C V, et al. The relationship of tampon characteristics to menstrual toxic shock syndrome[J]. JAMA, 1987, 258(7): 917-920. doi: 10.1001/jama.1987.03400070055034
[51] HAJJEH R A, REINGOLD A, WEIL A, et al. Toxic shock syndrome in the United States: Surveillance update, 1979-1996[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 1999, 5(6): 807-810. doi: 10.3201/eid0506.990611
[52] SCHLIEVERT P M. Comparison of cotton and cotton/rayon tampons for effect on production of toxic shock syndrome toxin[J]. J Infect Dis, 1995, 172(4): 1112-1114.
[53] PARSONNET J, MODERN P A, GIACOBBE K D. Effect of tampon composition on production of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 by Staphylococcus aureus in vitro[J]. J Infect Dis, 1996, 173(1): 98-103. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.1.98
[54] SCHLIEVERT P M, BLOMSTER D A. Production of staphylococcal pyrogenic exotoxin type C: Influence of physical and chemical factors[J]. J Infect Dis, 1983, 147(2): 236-242. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.2.236
[55] FISCHETTI V A, CHAPMAN F, KAKANI R, et al. Role of air in growth and production of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 by Staphylococcus aureus in experimental cotton and rayon tampons[J]. Rev Infect Dis, 1989, 11(Suppl 1): S176-S181.
[56] 伦敦皇家医学会. 欧洲中毒性休克综合征研讨会概要[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2000, 20(2): 117-120.
[57] 张 娜, 李依璇. 亚太地区一次性使用卫生用品现状及发展趋势[J]. 纺织导报, 2021(4): 26-34.
[58] 佚 名. 宝洁的卫生棉条再次进入中国[J]. 造纸装备及材料, 2017, 46(1): 18.
[59] 王小兰. 《卫生棉条》团标出台, 行业发展或将迎来春天[J]. 中国纤检, 2019(4): 84-86.
[60] 中国产业用纺织品行业协会. T/CNITA 09102—2018卫生棉条团体标准[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
[61] 蔡根生, 张静芬, 俞益麟, 等. 上海正常和带有宫内节育器妇女的经血量[J]. 上海医学, 1982, 5(3): 144-147.
[62] TORTELLI B A, LEWIS W G, ALLSWORTH J E, et al. Associations between the vaginal microbiome and Candida colonization in women of reproductive age[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 222(5): 471. e1-471. e9.
[63] MINIS E, FERNANDES MORON A, HATANAKA A, et al. The influence of race on cervical length in pregnant women in Brazil[J]. J Perinat Med, 2020, 49(3): 365-369.